"Given that free radicals clearly damage cells -- and given that people
who eat diets rich in substances that neutralize free radicals are
healthier -- why did studies of supplemental antioxidants show they were
harmful? The most likely explanation is that free radicals aren't as
evil as advertised. Although it's clear that free radicals can damage
DNA and disrupt cell membranes, that's not always a bad thing. People
need free radicals to kill bacteria and eliminate new cancer
cells. But when people take large doses of antioxidants, the balance
between free radical production and destruction might tip too much in
one direction, causing an unnatural state in which the immune system is
less able to kill harmful invaders. Researchers have called this "the
antioxidant paradox." Whatever the reason, the data are clear: high
doses of vitamins and supplements increase the risk of heart disease and
cancer; for this reason, not a single national or international
organization responsible for the public's health recommends them."
“And so I ask myself: 'Where are your dreams?' And I shake my head and mutter: 'How the years go by!' And I ask myself again: 'What have you done with those years? Where have you buried your best moments? Have you really lived?" Fyodor Dostoyevsky, White Nights
Subscrever:
Enviar feedback (Atom)
Arquivo do blogue
-
▼
2015
(92)
-
▼
setembro
(9)
- O problema do filho de Deus
- Gangs in L.A. w/ Retired LAPD Lt. Raymond Foster
- Face to Face - Entrevista com Carl Jung
- Quando uma relação aberta tem um preço
- The Vitamin Myth: Why We Think We Need Supplements
- 4 Ways to Tell If a Therapist Is Competent
- Género dos Nomes em Alemão
- Crescer. As crianças portuguesas são das que têm m...
- FM Attack - Magic
-
▼
setembro
(9)
Acerca de mim
- xy
- London, Harrow, United Kingdom
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário